March Madness Essay

promenade is sensation(a) of the craziest, fun-filled, exciting months of the year, especially for nation who love hoops plot of ground. St. Patricks Day arrives, the warmth is just starting to come back hardly that is not the best deviate, its all the demonstrate Madness. The NCAA basketball peppy Tournament brings happiness, laughter and upsets to some people and teams. Every Division 1 Basketball team in the country plays to eventually make it to the perfumed Sixteen on the bracket, in hopes of being the new NCAA Basketball Champions. Some teams struggle, while others come forbidden on top. The Game That Saved bound Madness written by Sean Gregory, Time staff author who has been writing about sports for about a decade, and Alexander Wolff, a writer for Sports Illustrated, talks about the go to bedn game between the Georgetown and Princeton Mens basketball teams in 1989 that saved the tradition of what is known as March Madness today.This game meant so much to the NCAA and fans who love the game of basketball because it was somewhat of a rebirth for college basketball. They talk about how Princeton, who was a number 16 seed in their division, played extremely well and almost won the game against the number 1 seed, Georgetown. Even though they fell one point short in the last few sulphurs, they made accounting and brought this tournament back to brio because never has a seed that low in a division ever put up that heavy(p) of a game against a top team in the country. People who the likes of basketball should read this article because Gregory and Wolff give the history of March Madness and they interest the reader with intricate detail of this event.History is an important part of everything in this world, whether it be culture, religion, or even sports. Gregory and Wolff incorporate a bunch of history in this article, which makes it worth reading. They talk about the background of the tournament. In 1939, the National Association of Bas ketball Coaches founded March Madness, which is the NCAA Mens Basketball tournament. For the first twelve years, there were only 8 officious teams. The tournament started to increase in favoriteity and gained over 60 teams within3 decades (Gregory and Wolff). They similarly explain how in 1989, the game between Georgetown and Princeton saved March Madness, and slowly however surely became the most popular clean-living event, right behind the Super Bowl. Before 1989, the March Madness tournament was starting to become predictable, and there was a real controversy concerning teams with low rankings being involved in the tournament because they would have no chance of winning a title.Gregory and Wolff say A St. Patricks Day audience, then the largest ever for a college basketball game on a young network called ESPN, was going to see a sixteenth seedthe lowest in the tournament blast a No. 1 for the first date. Before this game, no one in college basketball had witnessed this hap pen. Bob Scrabis, the senior captain of the Princeton Tigers basically changed the game forever. Princeton, being the lowest ranked team in tournament, gave Georgetown a run for their money. With one second left(p) in the game and down one point, Scrabis took the shot of life-timetime, but missed. Even though the Tigers did not beat the number one seeded Georgetown Hoyas, they proved that any team, ranked low or high, could provide the frolic of a good game and possibly future upsets. When basketball fans read this, they learn the background of one the most notorious sporting events that caused an uproar in college basketball and opened the eyes to many. They would also collect how March Madness as a tournament has changed and has become as big as it is now.Although the history of the game is very important, Gregory and Wolff are so knowledgable in the game of basketball that the way they describe this game makes readers feel like they could close their eyes and see the action h appen. Details can make or break a story, and in this case they made it. One way they press outed details were by describing the converse of the sports analysts Dick Vitale and John Saunders, who were calling the game. Dick Vitale said that if Princeton won, he would hitchhike from ESPNs offices in Bristol, Conn., to capital of Rhode Island and lead the Tigers cheerleaders for the second-round game (Gregory and Wolff). This was a While comparing the two teams, Gregory and Wolff sayThe teams also had contrasting styles. The Hoyas pushed the tread andpressured the ball full-court. We had a very nasty disposition about us, says Mourning. We played hard-nosed, rough, very defensive-minded, in-your-face basketball. The Tigers slowed the grounds in an attempt to neutralize the physical gap with other teams. You had to do something to take some proceedings off the clock, says Carril. To shorten the game. Carrils squad ran an intricate offense designed to lull defenses to sleep. The mo ment they conked out, the Tigers deployed their tactile sensation play a backdoor cut behind an unsuspecting opponent, often for an easy layup. They include details to show readers how the teams have played, which helps readers understand why and how this was such an important game to not just these two teams, but the whole college basketball community, as well. Another way they went into great detail is when they spoke about the takings of the game. Some people are impatient and want to just get to the point. Others, actually want to know every little detail to help them really understand why and what is going on. Gregory and Wolff said entirely Georgetown didnt wilt. Behind Mourning, the Hoyas clawed back until they were up by a point with one second remaining. Princeton in-bounder Matt Lapin passed to teammate Kit Mueller, who quickly put up a shot onward time ran out. Mourning got a pieceof what, we dont know. Something blew but it wasnt a tin whistle to send Mueller to the foul line. It was the horn, to officially end the game. Georgetown 50, Princeton 49. This part of the article makes readers feel at the edge of their seats, wait for the outcome of the game, just like they were watching it on TV. When authors like Wolff and Gregory include details like that, it brings life to the story that makes basketball fans want to keep reading more because it is just so intense and elicit to see how far college basketball has become.In spite of the fact that this game is a big part of college basketball history and it includes many details not everyone would want to read this article. People that do not like basketball would not read this because they would just simply not understand the content. If someone has never watched or have been around basketball before, they would not understand what the authors were talking about and why it progeny in the society of basketball.They would probably think this is just another game that was blown out of semblance a nd made to seem like a big deal. You cant understand something if you do no even off it any attention. Whether it be golf, tennis, volleyball or even football, if you have not watched that sport, you just would not dig out what Sean and Alexander were talking about. Also, some people choose other hobbies rather than sports. They could be into other things like video games, art and music. Even though those people might not actually like basketball or any other sports at that, they could enjoy watching underdogs come up and beat predicted teams and they could also have a very high level of school spirit, so they would still support their school.March Madness as a tournament has come a long way. Gregory and Wolff do a great job of explaining the history of the NCAA Mens Basketball Tournament, making it easy to understand how the game unfolded, and place in details that bring the article to life. Basketball fans should definitely read The Game That Saved March Madness by Sean Gregory and Alexander Wolff because they will gain knowledge about one of the most popular sporting events of this time and understand why it was so important.Works CitedGregory, Sean, and Alexander Wolff. The Game That Saved March Madness. Time 183.11 (2014) 50. Academic Search Complete. Web. 17 Apr. 2014.